Workplace Ethical Dilema

estimable predicaments prat occur at any meetplace. For this reason, codes of ethics argon developed to inspection and repair guide and set the standards for honourable expatriate for that profession. Code of ethics also helps exhibit procedures on how to deal with mis persuade. While function in the United States navy blue, I came crossways several respectable plights in my workplace. adept dilemma that I remember tout ensemble the way is one in which an policeman (higher(prenominal) rank) and enlisted (lower rank) were intricate in fraternization.Fraternization in the Navy is non acceptable and is referred to as a relationship between an enlisted and officer who ar dating, who engage in intimate conduct, take a home, borrow money or gamble. Fraternization in the military can be punishable under the alike Code of Military Justice. On senesce the Navy ship there were almost a total of 350 dish out members who were twain(prenominal) men and women. Interacti on between twain sexes was inevitable heretofore two service members on board took it too far. on that point was a service member (enlisted male) who began to sustain a relationship with his boss (female officer). both(prenominal) agreed to keep their relationship a secret while onboard the ship. One by and by noon I was out in town at a local store when I spotted both members holding hands together. I was non friends with either one, and did not put forward anything to them. I realized that their behavior was non honorable, but I did not pauperism to be involved. looking back at the location my estimations slightly it followed the principles of nonmaleficence. Nonmaleficence refers as doing no harm or mischief.I thought to myself that they were not do harm to anyone thence I did not want to communicate them. Through an honorable relativism view I realized that the dilemma was not morally defame however, the business office in which they were engages did not follow the ethical standards of the workplace. However my view almost the firm situation changed when I talked roughly it with another(prenominal) co-worker and she informed me that the female officer was married. The fact that she was married completely changed my stead about the situation.Now, not scarcely was it ethically wrong but it was morally wrong too. At this point the dilemma and then interfered with my somebodyal values. My soulal values ar may not be the self said(prenominal)(prenominal) to the ones of others however the choices they made went against my beliefs and values. Growing up I was always taught that fidelity and commitment to your partner is very important. I dictate myself in the spouses position and realized I would never want to go through that. The behaviors the engaged were dirty and I felt very awkward around them.I can colligate this dilemma to the thoughts of Socrates, that no one voluntarily does evil when they know good. If evil is through wi th(p) is because there is some type of benefit within for that person committing evil. The officer in this case is conscious(predicate) of the evil she is committing, however she is gaining comfort, perhaps love, or pleasure from her behavior with the enlisted male. Both personnel practiced ethical egoism, due to fact that they only fretting about their happiness and did not tuition about those who got yen.This is when I realized that I needed to speak up about this dilemma. In order to resolve this dilemma I needed to speak up and report what I knew and saw to my higher chain of command. I would have to say that I applied the theory of Kant. considerably depart and motivation was the base of my decisiveness to report the dilemma. I knew that making this conclusiveness was going to bring bad consequences for both members, however I did what I thought was best. In my conclusiveness making growth with the Kantian approach, ethical decisions were based on my sense of duty.The word duty is derived from the classical word deon (deontological). Duty refers to the acts of a person based on the principles of morality. In this decision making approach I had to assimilate decisions based on what is by rights quite an than the good or bad consequences that pull up stakes follow. A person must move over the morally right decision regardless of the good or bad outcome. two-dimensional imperative is what determines whether an act is morally right or wrong. The requirements of categorical imperatives are that moral principles are applied by respecting humanity.In this deontological point of view a person should act rational person and imprint self-imposed decisions. After reporting the situation to the chain of command, I was asked to speak up and testify along with others who had observed the same behaviors. Both services members were punished by the UCMJ and forced out of the military. The consequences to their behavior are what constitute it to be wrong . The ethical dilemma went against my in the flesh(predicate) values and belief. This is why I mulish to speak up and report what I knew regardless of the consequences.Both members were aware of the good and evil and instead decided to go for the evil not that they could hurt others. This ethical dilemma not only affected them in a personal level but affected the work place as well. After all the consequences, sailors onboard are very careful about fraternization. Workplace ethical dilemmas can determine at any work place, therefore it is important to maintain an updated code of ethics. This will help and guide employees on procedures , employee conduct and misconduct consequences.